--:--:--LOCAL ·--:--UTC
    MKT CAP$2.93T+0.6%
    24H VOL$109.8B
    BTC DOM58.0%
    HEALTH75BULLISH
    SHORT-TERM67NEUTRAL
    LONG-TERM83BULLISH
    OI$14.1B
    24H LIQ$78M
    LONG/SHORT53.9% / 46.1%
    REGIME (LT)BTC-LED BULL MARKET
    REGIME (ST)SQUEEZE
    HL OI$13.0B
    WHALESSHORT 43.8%
    MKT CAP$2.93T+0.6%
    24H VOL$109.8B
    BTC DOM58.0%
    HEALTH75BULLISH
    SHORT-TERM67NEUTRAL
    LONG-TERM83BULLISH
    OI$14.1B
    24H LIQ$78M
    LONG/SHORT53.9% / 46.1%
    REGIME (LT)BTC-LED BULL MARKET
    REGIME (ST)SQUEEZE
    HL OI$13.0B
    WHALESSHORT 43.8%
    Plug real-time crypto data into your AI agent — one command: Get your free API key →
    LoginGet API Key
    Home / Trading Strategies / Special Situations

    Special Situations Crypto Trading Strategies

    7 special situations strategies for crypto, from the AlgoBrain wiki. One-off dislocations with a defined resolution: bankruptcy claims, post-hack recoveries, forks, governance fights and counterparty stress. Each one lists the indicators it uses, the Crypto Data API endpoints that feed it and copy-paste prompts for an AI agent to build and backtest it. All of them are in the API: GET /api/v1/strategies?group=special-situations.

    7 strategies Most-used indicators: Funding Rate

    Every Special Situations strategy

    Compound-Fork Donation-Attack Systematic Short #

    position advanced backtest: paper-traded structural edgeanalytical edge

    A narrow but reliably-recurring arbitrage (directional short) strategy: short Compound-fork tokens during their first 6-12 months post-launch as a bet on the well-documented donation-attack pattern recurring.

    Why it works: Compound v2 has a well-documented donation/empty-market vulnerability that has been exploited repeatedly: Hundred Finance (Apr 2023), Onyx Protocol (Nov 2023, again Sep 2024), Sonne Finance (May 2024, $20M), and recurring Venus Protocol incidents (Feb 2025 zkSync, Mar 2026 BNB Chain). Each fork inherits the vulnerability template; AI scanners catch the pattern reliably; teams continue shipping any

    Indicators Price and volume only — see the playbook for the exact rules.
    CDA endpoints/api/v1/hyperliquid/candles/api/v1/market-data/klines
    Via API/api/v1/strategies/compound-fork-donation-short
    AI-agent prompts
    Build it with an AI agent
    Build the Compound-Fork Donation-Attack Systematic Short crypto trading strategy using the CryptoDataAPI (X-API-Key header, base https://cryptodataapi.com).
    
    1. Read the playbook first: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/algobrain/page?path=wiki/strategies/arbitrage/compound-fork-donation-short.md
    2. Pull the inputs:
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/hyperliquid/candles
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/market-data/klines
    3. Compute the signals described in the playbook on 1d bars (pinned: interval=1d, lookback=500 bars, universe=BTC,ETH,SOL unless the playbook says otherwise).
    4. Emit entry/exit rules, position size (risk 1% of equity per trade) and a stop, as JSON: {"symbol","side","entry","stop","target","size_pct","reason"}.
    5. State which regime the rules are valid in (GET /api/v1/regimes/current) and stand aside outside it. Research only — do not place orders.
    Backtest it
    Backtest the Compound-Fork Donation-Attack Systematic Short strategy on CryptoDataAPI history before trusting it.
    
    - Bars: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/backtesting/klines?symbol=BTC&interval=1d (Pro)
    - Funding: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/backtesting/funding?symbol=BTC (Pro)
    - Rules: from the playbook at /api/v1/algobrain/page?path=wiki/strategies/arbitrage/compound-fork-donation-short.md
    Pinned: fees 4.5 bps taker per side, 2 bps slippage, funding applied every 8h, signals on bar close only (no lookahead), 70/30 in-sample/out-of-sample split. Report CAGR, Sharpe, max drawdown, trade count and out-of-sample vs in-sample decay.

    Counterparty Stress Arbitrage #

    swing advanced backtest: live structural edgeinformational edgeanalytical edge

    A strategy that trades the price impact of forced unwinds by counterparties whose position size exceeds market-clearing liquidity and whose capital structure forces them to unwind on a defined timeline.

    Why it works: When a counterparty's position size exceeds market-clearing liquidity AND their capital structure forces an unwind on a defined timeline, the unwind path is structurally predictable. The trade is to receive the price impact of that forced unwind. Counterparty: the forced seller, whose capital structure makes their marginal price non-fundamental. Examples: Arnold/Amaranth 2006, Soros/BoE 1992, 3AC

    Indicators Price and volume only — see the playbook for the exact rules.
    CDA endpoints/api/v1/derivatives/funding-rates/api/v1/hyperliquid/funding-rates/api/v1/sentiment/stablecoins/api/v1/event/calendar/api/v1/news/market-moving/api/v1/sentiment/macro
    Via API/api/v1/strategies/counterparty-stress-arbitrage
    AI-agent prompts
    Build it with an AI agent
    Build the Counterparty Stress Arbitrage crypto trading strategy using the CryptoDataAPI (X-API-Key header, base https://cryptodataapi.com).
    
    1. Read the playbook first: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/algobrain/page?path=wiki/strategies/arbitrage/counterparty-stress-arbitrage.md
    2. Pull the inputs:
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/derivatives/funding-rates
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/hyperliquid/funding-rates
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/sentiment/stablecoins
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/event/calendar
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/news/market-moving
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/sentiment/macro
    3. Compute the signals described in the playbook on 4h bars (pinned: interval=4h, lookback=500 bars, universe=BTC,ETH,SOL unless the playbook says otherwise).
    4. Emit entry/exit rules, position size (risk 1% of equity per trade) and a stop, as JSON: {"symbol","side","entry","stop","target","size_pct","reason"}.
    5. State which regime the rules are valid in (GET /api/v1/regimes/current) and stand aside outside it. Research only — do not place orders.
    Backtest it
    Backtest the Counterparty Stress Arbitrage strategy on CryptoDataAPI history before trusting it.
    
    - Bars: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/backtesting/klines?symbol=BTC&interval=4h (Pro)
    - Funding: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/backtesting/funding?symbol=BTC (Pro)
    - Rules: from the playbook at /api/v1/algobrain/page?path=wiki/strategies/arbitrage/counterparty-stress-arbitrage.md
    Pinned: fees 4.5 bps taker per side, 2 bps slippage, funding applied every 8h, signals on bar close only (no lookahead), 70/30 in-sample/out-of-sample split. Report CAGR, Sharpe, max drawdown, trade count and out-of-sample vs in-sample decay.

    Crypto Bankruptcy Claim Arbitrage #

    long-term advanced backtest: pilot analytical edgeinformational edgestructural edge

    Crypto bankruptcy claim arbitrage involves buying claims against failed crypto firms — Mt. Gox, Celsius, Voyager, FTX, BlockFi, Genesis — at a discount on secondary OTC markets, then waiting for the bankruptcy estate to distribute recoveries.

    Why it works: Bankruptcy claims trade at a discount to ultimate recovery because most retail creditors lack patience, accreditation, or legal expertise; specialised funds underwrite the legal process and earn the spread.

    Indicators Price and volume only — see the playbook for the exact rules.
    CDA endpoints/api/v1/hyperliquid/candles/api/v1/market-data/klines
    Via API/api/v1/strategies/bankruptcy-claim-arbitrage
    AI-agent prompts
    Build it with an AI agent
    Build the Crypto Bankruptcy Claim Arbitrage crypto trading strategy using the CryptoDataAPI (X-API-Key header, base https://cryptodataapi.com).
    
    1. Read the playbook first: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/algobrain/page?path=wiki/strategies/arbitrage/bankruptcy-claim-arbitrage.md
    2. Pull the inputs:
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/hyperliquid/candles
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/market-data/klines
    3. Compute the signals described in the playbook on 1d bars (pinned: interval=1d, lookback=500 bars, universe=BTC,ETH,SOL unless the playbook says otherwise).
    4. Emit entry/exit rules, position size (risk 1% of equity per trade) and a stop, as JSON: {"symbol","side","entry","stop","target","size_pct","reason"}.
    5. State which regime the rules are valid in (GET /api/v1/regimes/current) and stand aside outside it. Research only — do not place orders.
    Backtest it
    Backtest the Crypto Bankruptcy Claim Arbitrage strategy on CryptoDataAPI history before trusting it.
    
    - Bars: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/backtesting/klines?symbol=BTC&interval=1d (Pro)
    - Funding: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/backtesting/funding?symbol=BTC (Pro)
    - Rules: from the playbook at /api/v1/algobrain/page?path=wiki/strategies/arbitrage/bankruptcy-claim-arbitrage.md
    Pinned: fees 4.5 bps taker per side, 2 bps slippage, funding applied every 8h, signals on bar close only (no lookahead), 70/30 in-sample/out-of-sample split. Report CAGR, Sharpe, max drawdown, trade count and out-of-sample vs in-sample decay.

    Governance & Restitution Arbitrage #

    swing advanced backtest: live analytical edgeinformational edge

    The days-2-through-weeks-8 playbook for trading the governance-vote and restitution waterfall after major crypto exploits. Sub-strategy of ai amplified exploit arbitrage.

    Why it works: Post-exploit governance windows create predictable trading patterns. Note: DeFi OTC claim markets are thin to non-existent compared to bankruptcy claim trading — recovery in DeFi typically happens fast (weeks) via direct treasury reimbursement or not at all. Real edges: (a) governance-vote uncertainty arb on protocol-native tokens during decision windows, (b) bridge-token discount arb when wrapped

    Indicators Price and volume only — see the playbook for the exact rules.
    CDA endpoints/api/v1/hyperliquid/candles
    Via API/api/v1/strategies/governance-restitution-arbitrage
    AI-agent prompts
    Build it with an AI agent
    Build the Governance & Restitution Arbitrage crypto trading strategy using the CryptoDataAPI (X-API-Key header, base https://cryptodataapi.com).
    
    1. Read the playbook first: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/algobrain/page?path=wiki/strategies/arbitrage/governance-restitution-arbitrage.md
    2. Pull the inputs:
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/hyperliquid/candles
    3. Compute the signals described in the playbook on 4h bars (pinned: interval=4h, lookback=500 bars, universe=BTC,ETH,SOL unless the playbook says otherwise).
    4. Emit entry/exit rules, position size (risk 1% of equity per trade) and a stop, as JSON: {"symbol","side","entry","stop","target","size_pct","reason"}.
    5. State which regime the rules are valid in (GET /api/v1/regimes/current) and stand aside outside it. Research only — do not place orders.
    Backtest it
    Backtest the Governance & Restitution Arbitrage strategy on CryptoDataAPI history before trusting it.
    
    - Bars: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/backtesting/klines?symbol=BTC&interval=4h (Pro)
    - Funding: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/backtesting/funding?symbol=BTC (Pro)
    - Rules: from the playbook at /api/v1/algobrain/page?path=wiki/strategies/arbitrage/governance-restitution-arbitrage.md
    Pinned: fees 4.5 bps taker per side, 2 bps slippage, funding applied every 8h, signals on bar close only (no lookahead), 70/30 in-sample/out-of-sample split. Report CAGR, Sharpe, max drawdown, trade count and out-of-sample vs in-sample decay.

    Mythos Release-Window Exploit Short (Hyperliquid Perps) #

    swing advanced backtest: speculative informational edgestructural edgeanalytical edge

    A directional, event-driven short basket on Hyperliquid perpetuals, pre-positioned cheap-to-carry and scaled into the Mythos public-release window (now live, June–September 2026).

    Why it works: A frontier model (Mythos) materially stronger at offensive security than Opus 4.8 — which already found the four-year ZEC Orchard counterfeiting bug — has now entered public release (9 Jun 2026, as Claude Fable 5 + the Glasswing-restricted Claude Mythos 5). This compresses attacker (and white-hat-disclosure) cost-per-vulnerability faster than protocol patch cycles can respond, raising the near-ter

    Indicators Funding Rate
    CDA endpoints/api/v1/derivatives/funding-rates/api/v1/hyperliquid/funding-rates/api/v1/derivatives/open-interest/api/v1/hyperliquid/open-interest/api/v1/hyperliquid/l2-book/api/v1/liquidity/depth
    Via API/api/v1/strategies/mythos-release-window-exploit-short
    AI-agent prompts
    Build it with an AI agent
    Build the Mythos Release-Window Exploit Short (Hyperliquid Perps) crypto trading strategy using the CryptoDataAPI (X-API-Key header, base https://cryptodataapi.com).
    
    1. Read the playbook first: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/algobrain/page?path=wiki/strategies/mythos-release-window-exploit-short.md
    2. Pull the inputs:
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/derivatives/funding-rates
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/hyperliquid/funding-rates
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/derivatives/open-interest
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/hyperliquid/open-interest
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/hyperliquid/l2-book
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/liquidity/depth
    3. Compute Funding Rate on 4h bars (pinned: interval=4h, lookback=500 bars, universe=BTC,ETH,SOL unless the playbook says otherwise).
    4. Emit entry/exit rules, position size (risk 1% of equity per trade) and a stop, as JSON: {"symbol","side","entry","stop","target","size_pct","reason"}.
    5. State which regime the rules are valid in (GET /api/v1/regimes/current) and stand aside outside it. Research only — do not place orders.
    Backtest it
    Backtest the Mythos Release-Window Exploit Short (Hyperliquid Perps) strategy on CryptoDataAPI history before trusting it.
    
    - Bars: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/backtesting/klines?symbol=BTC&interval=4h (Pro)
    - Funding: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/backtesting/funding?symbol=BTC (Pro)
    - Rules: from the playbook at /api/v1/algobrain/page?path=wiki/strategies/mythos-release-window-exploit-short.md
    Pinned: fees 4.5 bps taker per side, 2 bps slippage, funding applied every 8h, signals on bar close only (no lookahead), 70/30 in-sample/out-of-sample split. Report CAGR, Sharpe, max drawdown, trade count and out-of-sample vs in-sample decay.

    Post-Hack Incident Response Arbitrage #

    intraday advanced backtest: live structural edgeinformational edge

    The 0-72 hour playbook for trading crypto exploits at the moment of disclosure. A member of the arbitrage family — specifically an event-driven convergence arbitrage where the "fair value" is the realised loss-to-TVL ratio and the convergence is the market re-pricing toward it once liquidity gates lift.

    Why it works: First 0-72h post-disclosure: CEXs halt deposits/withdrawals while DEXs stay open → DEX-CEX price decouples. LSTs and stablecoins overshoot fundamental loss-to-TVL ratio. Perp funding spikes as longs liquidate. Ladder shorts on first credible report, cover on confirmation; long the LST/stable depeg overshoot.

    Indicators Price and volume only — see the playbook for the exact rules.
    CDA endpoints/api/v1/derivatives/funding-rates/api/v1/hyperliquid/funding-rates/api/v1/on-chain/exchange-flows/spike-alerts/api/v1/sentiment/stablecoins/api/v1/news/market-moving/api/v1/dex/trending
    Via API/api/v1/strategies/post-hack-incident-response-arb
    AI-agent prompts
    Build it with an AI agent
    Build the Post-Hack Incident Response Arbitrage crypto trading strategy using the CryptoDataAPI (X-API-Key header, base https://cryptodataapi.com).
    
    1. Read the playbook first: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/algobrain/page?path=wiki/strategies/arbitrage/post-hack-incident-response-arb.md
    2. Pull the inputs:
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/derivatives/funding-rates
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/hyperliquid/funding-rates
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/on-chain/exchange-flows/spike-alerts
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/sentiment/stablecoins
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/news/market-moving
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/dex/trending
    3. Compute the signals described in the playbook on 15m bars (pinned: interval=15m, lookback=500 bars, universe=BTC,ETH,SOL unless the playbook says otherwise).
    4. Emit entry/exit rules, position size (risk 1% of equity per trade) and a stop, as JSON: {"symbol","side","entry","stop","target","size_pct","reason"}.
    5. State which regime the rules are valid in (GET /api/v1/regimes/current) and stand aside outside it. Research only — do not place orders.
    Backtest it
    Backtest the Post-Hack Incident Response Arbitrage strategy on CryptoDataAPI history before trusting it.
    
    - Bars: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/backtesting/klines?symbol=BTC&interval=15m (Pro)
    - Funding: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/backtesting/funding?symbol=BTC (Pro)
    - Rules: from the playbook at /api/v1/algobrain/page?path=wiki/strategies/arbitrage/post-hack-incident-response-arb.md
    Pinned: fees 4.5 bps taker per side, 2 bps slippage, funding applied every 8h, signals on bar close only (no lookahead), 70/30 in-sample/out-of-sample split. Report CAGR, Sharpe, max drawdown, trade count and out-of-sample vs in-sample decay.

    Vampire Attack Arbitrage #

    swing advanced backtest: untested behavioral edgestructural edgeinformational edge

    Vampire attack arbitrage is the strategy of providing liquidity (or volume, or order flow) as a liquidity provider to a forked protocol that pays migrating users in inflationary governance tokens, capturing those rewards, and exiting before token emissions dilute the price.

    Why it works: Forked protocols subsidise migration with inflationary governance tokens; early LPs capture rewards before sell-pressure dilutes them, while incumbents are slow to defend their moat.

    Indicators Price and volume only — see the playbook for the exact rules.
    CDA endpoints/api/v1/on-chain/exchange-flows/spike-alerts/api/v1/supply/unlocks/api/v1/dex/trending/api/v1/dex/new-pools/api/v1/hyperliquid/candles
    Via API/api/v1/strategies/vampire-attack-arbitrage
    AI-agent prompts
    Build it with an AI agent
    Build the Vampire Attack Arbitrage crypto trading strategy using the CryptoDataAPI (X-API-Key header, base https://cryptodataapi.com).
    
    1. Read the playbook first: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/algobrain/page?path=wiki/strategies/arbitrage/vampire-attack-arbitrage.md
    2. Pull the inputs:
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/on-chain/exchange-flows/spike-alerts
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/supply/unlocks
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/dex/trending
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/dex/new-pools
    - GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/hyperliquid/candles
    3. Compute the signals described in the playbook on 4h bars (pinned: interval=4h, lookback=500 bars, universe=BTC,ETH,SOL unless the playbook says otherwise).
    4. Emit entry/exit rules, position size (risk 1% of equity per trade) and a stop, as JSON: {"symbol","side","entry","stop","target","size_pct","reason"}.
    5. State which regime the rules are valid in (GET /api/v1/regimes/current) and stand aside outside it. Research only — do not place orders.
    Backtest it
    Backtest the Vampire Attack Arbitrage strategy on CryptoDataAPI history before trusting it.
    
    - Bars: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/backtesting/klines?symbol=BTC&interval=4h (Pro)
    - Funding: GET https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/backtesting/funding?symbol=BTC (Pro)
    - Rules: from the playbook at /api/v1/algobrain/page?path=wiki/strategies/arbitrage/vampire-attack-arbitrage.md
    Pinned: fees 4.5 bps taker per side, 2 bps slippage, funding applied every 8h, signals on bar close only (no lookahead), 70/30 in-sample/out-of-sample split. Report CAGR, Sharpe, max drawdown, trade count and out-of-sample vs in-sample decay.

    Get these strategies from the API

    curl -H "X-API-Key: cdk_live_yourkey" \
      "https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/strategies?group=special-situations"
    
    curl -H "X-API-Key: cdk_live_yourkey" \
      "https://cryptodataapi.com/api/v1/strategies/compound-fork-donation-short"

    Any key works, Free included — mint one in a single call. The list endpoint returns summaries; the per-slug endpoint adds the prompts, edge mechanism and data inputs. Full playbooks come from /api/v1/algobrain/page?path=… using each entry's wiki_path. Or use the MCP server.

    What are special situations crypto trading strategies?

    One-off dislocations with a defined resolution: bankruptcy claims, post-hack recoveries, forks, governance fights and counterparty stress.

    How many special situations strategies are there?

    7: Compound-Fork Donation-Attack Systematic Short, Counterparty Stress Arbitrage, Crypto Bankruptcy Claim Arbitrage, Governance & Restitution Arbitrage, Mythos Release-Window Exploit Short (Hyperliquid Perps), Post-Hack Incident Response Arbitrage, Vampire Attack Arbitrage.

    Which indicators do special situations strategies use?

    Most often Funding Rate.

    Can an AI agent build these strategies from an API?

    Yes. GET /api/v1/strategies?group=special-situations lists them; GET /api/v1/strategies/{slug} returns the build and backtest prompts, and each prompt names the exact Crypto Data API endpoints to call. Any API key works, Free included.